Razor vs Blazor Alternatives
Two of the most popular frameworks for building web applications are Razor and Blazor.
Razor is designed to work with ASP.NET Core, a cross-platform framework for building web applications.
The main advantage of Razor is that it is more lightweight than Blazor, which makes it easier to develop and deploy applications. It also has better support for SEO (Search Engine Optimization) because it generates static HTML pages, which search engines can easily crawl. However, the disadvantage of Razor is that it relies heavily on server-side processing, which can slow down the application and make it less responsive.
On the other hand, Blazor is more modern and powerful than Razor, as it uses WebAssembly to run compiled code in the browser, which makes it faster and more responsive. It also has better support for real-time applications, such as chat or gaming. However, the disadvantage of Blazor is that it requires a modern browser that supports WebAssembly, which can limit the number of users who can access the application. Visit this blog for more clarification https://ironpdf.com/blog/net-help/razor-vs-blazor/.
When choosing between Razor and Blazor, developers should consider their specific needs and requirements. If they need a lightweight framework for developing and deploying applications quickly, then Razor is the better choice. However, if they need a more modern and robust framework with better support for real-time applications, then Blazor is the better choice. Ultimately, the choice between Razor and Blazor depends on the specific needs of the project and the preferences of the developer.